Transmission: Andre Stitt. Threads.

22 02 2010

A voice from Northern Ireland. A journey to Belfast. A particular tone, soft and violent, troubling. André Stitt speaks about his creative activity, his native Ireland with passion. It is a family table blackened by unbearable events. They are personal, particular, strong memories.

He writes, paints, draws and produces music. An artist.

The child of the street that he was tells his experiments, his trauma, without losing his breath, all that crossed his life of young man now grown to full stature. What he lived in Belfast, he carries it everywhere, in London, in New York, in the world. When he stages his own life he raises questions, questions itself, questions our capacity to grasp events, analyse and try to understand them. The present faces the past. The artist is still entangled in delusion.

Interpretations of Trauma. One feels unease, out of his zone of control, sometimes taken of nausea but also of empathy when looking at certain images: Saintfield, a market of Belfast, vegetables, odours of urines, drinking, pubs. Personal records: Auntie Alice and Uncle Ted.

He says himself saved by his studies at Art school of Belfast, the influence of Beuys. The voice becomes softer when He begins to talk about amnesia. He cannot remember what occurred between 1983 and 1992, he cannot put words on them. Gone. There is no representation of the Trauma. It consists of association and evocation rather than representation. Investigating another level through Trauma, domestic violence, alcohol, drugs. The images ravel, without noise, they are violent, disturbing, disrupting.

When he tells his performances as an artist in Sheffield or elsewhere, his voice sticks to images of debauchery, the music is puzzling. But amnesia is there. Some images on the newspapers are strange for him, unknown. He discovers them. Performance Art drives him in very dark hole, like a think possessed. The body setting in abyss, it is like a diving in the still open wounds of the communal memories, the demon within. debauchery, uncontrolled drinking, sprinkling food. Opposition to modern consumerism. Exorcism, demon drink ghost, recovery.

Contemporary experiments of conflict. His work is much to do with what to be transformed and not the conflict itself. His art reflects to others personal experiments. Disorder in North Ireland made him what He is now. Telling his stories, his city, he memorialises the time he lived in Belfast (Catholic Culture, Public humiliation, conflict transformation). Archives.

The change is change, it is not accommodation.

A parallel in the suffering, the political struggle: the image of two black athletes raising the fist in Mexico City in 1968. Political conscience (Political Awakening).

Present tense.  He speaks of Dilemma as a guiding delusion of our time.

Life, Art, life as a natural consciousness. Every action as a performance of consciousness (Family and communal Trauma). Performing as a healing process. He projects and looks at them with delusion by investigating another level through Trauma, domestic violence, alcohol, drugs, political conflicts. He stages himself, He questions himself, his voice fades into deep softness. He says he has stopped drinking, He feels alleviated by putting his own experiments and seeing what and where the substance is, what the material of art is and trying to set a critical distance about his own emotions. Art as a work of attention of details. Today he has cured this deep suffering in alcohol used as a fuel, drugs and familial violence. Trauma. He has stopped drinking. But Belfast is in him forever. He measures the present in the past.

Now that the phantoms of the past disappear little by little, it is the time of contemplation, of silence. The time of recovery, of beauty and human celebration eventhough making Art has never shown him what is mean.

One cannot leave Stitt’s clinical experiments undisturbed. There is a palpable emotion in the room, a deep silence but much respect for his sincerity, honesty and his recovery. Minutes after his reading, I wanted to advance towards this man who faces his own demons with courage, to shake his hand and tell him my empathy, embrace him with my heart. I did not dare. I am still looking at this child on his street in Belfast, and his voice is stuck to me as a gentleness of ages. I look at him as a member of my family recovered after a long voyage in the abyss.

I saw you in the street when I was born.

B.





Transmission review: Kate Davis Queen of Monotony (27th Jan 2010)

2 02 2010

By Brook Davis

Kate Davis began is presentation by stating that the movie had been made a little rushed and had some technical problems, therefore would expect some failures

Well, who is honest deserves respect, but…

The movie started, a camera fixed on one side of a bridge, showing the other side in the darkness, the visibility was almost none, seeing only a few moving lights. Behind, a voice quite monotone, his own, reading a text about bridges and how they connected the people and how people were connected to each other, yet the prevailing thoughts throughout the text, was absences and a repetitive me, me and me. In fact that entire monotonous monologue spoke of misunderstandings and chance encounters, past somewhere behind, under or over bridges. Connections and disconnection all this over a day that would lighten the image, while a monotone voice continued to unwind the thread, but getting nowhere.

At the end, another excuse, I’m not a writer and this was my first text… Frankly, it was better to have been silent.

However behind all that blablabla something left that made worthwhile, a phrase resonating in my head: If a city is a body, the bridge is its spine.

Want to read more? Writings from my Head





Transmission review: Juan Cruz the Translator in Person (02nd Dec 2009)

2 02 2010



By Brook Davis

Juan Cruz is a Spanish living in England who decided to exploit their knowledge of culture and language, to become a translator, translating into English some interesting names of Spanish literature.

This presentation showed another interesting facet of Juan Cruz. From a conventional translator, became a translator in direct, making a piece of theatrical art, a live translation of Don Quixote. For the piece presented it was possible to attend the difficulty of such representation.

However, perhaps tired of translating books, he decided to produce a different kind of work and began to experiment different things.

Two books clamped together to a table, “Simplified Dictionary” and “Artists Artifacts”, theory and practice joined together or how to simplify the execution of art. However according to the author was an accidental artwork.

A video work about a normal day of his life, works at home, the musical education of their children, playing with them…

Anyway it was interesting, deserves a “worth it” for originality.

Want to read more? Writings from my Head





Transmission review: Amanda Beech the Little Dictator (25th Nov 2009)

2 02 2010

By Brook Davis

The Amanda’s Beech presentation was based on totalitarianism and some key statements:

Art is the process of difference and change.

Art is enlightenment, making us advance.

Materiality or Materialism?

Nazi art is not art.

Criticism is a bad habit.

Frankly, criticism is a bad habit? What she wanted to insinuate? And this after saying that criticism was important for students…

She basically denied the art developed under totalitarianism, sticking Nazi aesthetics and Soviet Realism under the same roof ignoring them and denying them as an art form.

Subsequently presents us with Leviathan of Thomas Hobbes, a force of nature and a pre-political space. The state protects the freedom ensuring our security. It is about the torture of the community as art, the strange task of modernist and what art should and could do. The art should say something about our social relationships; relational aesthetics is equivalent to neo-conservatism. She is opposed to socialism believes in rationalism. She spokes of the power of language, transmits its force and vitality. The success of the image as an end…

After all we come to the conclusion that she speaks against Nazi art but is ideas are of a liberal fascist. In fact all of his speech was a great Salmagundi.

Finally with his hand on the hip, as if it was a matron, she presented us a video with an overwhelming text impossible to read. The music was incredibly high and the images that have a fierce, almost dictatorial, imposing an idea with a brute force. The aim is to persuade, not to be persuaded.

In short, we are faced with an incongruous artist, openly anti-Marxist and anti-Nazi, but shows the capability to use the same techniques of persuasion used in those regimes and by absurd she criticizes the criticism. Machiavelli wouldn’t have been better. However if we believe in the words of Picasso who said that art needs to shock because if doesn’t shock isn’t art, we are in the presence of a great artist.

Want to read more? Writings from my Head





Transmission review: Penny McCarthy and Tim Etchells, a work about “Absence” (14th Oct 2009)

2 02 2010

By Brook Davis

Penny and Tim have provided us with one of those rare moments in art. The creation “in live” of an art work.

At the beginning of the presentation they captivated the audience by stating that before making it they would read some e-mails that were exchanged in order to prepare the presentation. After a few minutes, became obvious that the presentation was none other than the exchange of e-mails, were in the presence of the creation of an art work “in live”.

However, this was the only highlight of the presentation, as the reading of the alleged e-mail showed up boring and incipient, not for the content, but because the way the work was read.

In fact, the intonation given by Tim in his reading, demonstrated a rude unwillingness and imperious absence (subject that the text meant in its entirety) taking us almost thinking that their attitude would be part of the representation, but it was clear that that was not. It was clear the utter lack of willingness of the author to be there.

From Penny, perhaps by empathy, their intonation as the beginning was vibrant, became blurry and insignificant, following the flow.

They ended the presentation with a very quick view of Tim’s past victories (read past works). From the faded Penny, not even a line.

Honestly I expected more from these two authors who already accustomed us with better moments with his class and previous publications.

Want to read more? Writings from my Head





Transmission rambling: My firth transmission day (07th Oct 2009)

2 02 2010

By Xesko

Finally after three weeks of boredom, the MA began. In the first day, I attended a lecture by an artist couple, rather peculiar.

When I was informed that every week we would have these kind of shows my first thought was: ******* (it is better not to transcribe my thoughts). I was wrong, at least for this first one.

The beginning was a little bit desperate, so they had put a photograph of an in works storefront. I thought that would be a boring talk about that kind of contemporary art that only the artist understands and that no one else knows what is about, leaving the others persons out of the creative context, but… Something changed my idea. They have put a background music of Aphrodite’s Child, “Rain and Tears”, a group that happens I know very well because I was and somewhat still am, fam of Vangelis and Demis Roussos, two the founder members of the group.

From that point forward it was a parade of conceptual ideas, many of them based on the Pink Floyd albums, also a conceptual music group.

The main idea of the lecture was nothing more than recreations of the random day-to-day art. That is, capturing what the artist saw around him, recreating (plagiarizing it?) with artistic eye creating a single engagement with the public.

However after the presentation remains the idea that the common thread that is the driving force that moves this couple of artists, is none other than the great unknown/known, the ideas of the vastness of the universe as we know it, their misunderstanding and intimate links with the darker parts of our being, basically what makes us live and that we, in spite of knowing intimately, at the end of the day remains unknown.

In other words, most of the ideas are developed around our internal organs, healthy eating and the mystery of the universe and its best kept secret, the design of a living being.

Summarize it in one word. Liked.

Want to read more? Writings from my Head





Transmission rambling: Monotone versus Monotonous (27th Jan 2010)

2 02 2010

By Xesko

I do not know what to say, I hope that this first transmission of the quarter will not be an omen of what awaits me. The first one I attended last quarter, was an unexpected surprise as well as the past quarter, while this … Well as I said, I do not know what to say.

Kate began with a series of excuses about the movie she had done and when the presentation started I realized why. In fact the movie was awful. It was too dark (should have used a night filter) only a few lights in the background when some cars and buses passed and, suddenly… An omnipresent voice echoed through the sound system of the showroom, a monotone voice reading a text.

The text in the beginning was interesting though it was highly personal and the word heard most often was me, which demonstrated a huge ego hidden in that little sad figure.

And in the midst of darkness began the monotony of at completely monotone text; bridges, me, connections, kiss, me, love, caresses, fluids, me, sex, zzzzzzzzzz.

That monotone monotony assisted with the darkness in the showroom caused me to asleep. Someone somewhere next to me gave me a shove and I woke for the day, not for a real day but on the movie, we already could see something and that voice still ubiquitous and monotonous, and finally a question by the author, the movie is over? I think so!

And so at last, ended the massacre of the bridge of the voice of the river and of the silence.

Summarize it in one word. Monotonous.

Want to read more? Writings from my Head





Transmission rambling: A day to forget (14th Oct 2009)

2 02 2010

By Xesko

Boring, boring, boring, boring, boring, boring, boring. Basically this is the only thing I have to say about what I saw.

In the beginning Penny McCarthy said that she had challenged his friend Tim Etchells, to make that presentation together and that he had shown first open to the idea and then reluctant.

Tim then, explained that this reluctance was due to being out of the country and therefore not having time to prepare for the conversation, so it had to be prepared by an exchange of e-mails that they would read.

??????????????? But where are we? In Big Brother? What we have to do with the preparation of the work and the exchange of personal e-mails?

Soon they began to read their e-mails that supposedly would have been exchanged during the preparation of the work, e-mails about the lack of time and lack of it and also about Penny’s paranoia about old things and about the past, and through absurd stories about misplaced conversations.

After some time we realize that the alleged e-mails were, in fact, the presentation, thereby demonstrating a rather interesting creativity and putting it to us (the public) before the creation “in live” of an art work.

However, the way Tim, clearly uncomfortable and showing a complete detachment and boredom read the same, became is hearing strangely boring, to the point to hear yawning in the room (apart from a constant clearing throats of the public).

To conclude the presentation, Tim showed some of his earlier work, including a theatrical piece of 6h that approached the absurd, since it was dedicated to the muted conversations, in other words, 6 boring hours based on stories in which the actors are interrupted each other thereby preventing any story comes to an end, supposedly to let the public imagination the completion of the unfinished conversations. Honestly? My opinion? If I had been invited to see that play, after 15 minutes I had get up and walked out the room. Oh! I just remember an important situation that I forgot to mention, supposedly this was expected because attend the play was open to that possibility. Therefore I wonder, what is the interest in this theatrical piece? Demonstrate an alleged erudition exclusive to few, assuming that the weak-minded that did not understand what was going on applaud it assuming that this is a unique work of theatre and, the most erudite, do not understanding the purpose cheer with a creation of a contemporary art work too advanced for them to understand? In my humble opinion, was merely a figure of speech without any specific target that was not the capacity to train those involved, with no need to slaughter the public and should never had passed the rehearsal.

Following the presentation, showed other studies, once again about the absence and of the spirit of her, anyway, nothing interesting worth mentioning. From Penny, completely overshadowed by Tim, absolutely nothing.

Summarize it in one word. Boring.

Want to read more? Writings from my Head





Kelly Large, Transmission Review Objective Voice

29 01 2010

Throughout Kelly Large’s talk I had a sense of a highly intelligent, articulate, brave practitioner, able to challenge her collaborators, use stealth and cunning in her in engagements with institutions with a compulsion to put herself into the very situations that scare her most.  In short, Large’s work is ballsy and confident, even though I sense she has not hit her stride yet.

So, my question is, why the terminal self-deprecation?

A winced my way through Large’s chatty talk.  In spite of herself she came across as immensely likeable, but, she made me want to de-brief her in the pub and tell her not to put herself down in this context, audiences have a temptation to believe what they hear.  Of course, I am not suggesting that all I wish to sit through is male bravado and smarmy showing off each week, but Large’s talk made me wonder if is a female compulsion to talk themselves down in this type of arena.  Is it that Large is a woman that she feels unable to say, ‘I have a PhD and years of practice behind me, damn it!, I know what I am doing and I know who I am and  I’m ok’.  Instead, I heard her tell me she was nervous, she hates residencies and she does not like people.  She then started to list her skills, almost as though she had been challenged as a phoney; which she sees are administrative, social, analytical and critical.  The way she described the process of working through residencies she is offered made it sound as though she was a gun for hire, never able to choose a direction.  Oh Kelly!  Can I hire you to be a confident artist?





Kelly Large, Transmission Review Stream of Consciousness

29 01 2010

She went to Liverpool Uni with Becky. The cloth on the table is distractingly wrinkly. She’s talking about process and product. She admits she’s nervous. She says she hates residencies. She puts herself through the mill, New Art Gallery Wallsall. “I’m just going to take some water”. Fear of publicness. She doesn’t like people, she produces socially engaged practice but she’s antisocial. I wish I asked her about this, I think getting to her motivations would be very illuminating. Maybe her unconscious motivations.
She’s self deprecating, she is talking herself down. She’s talking about exposing positions and structures, art in residency situation versus art in the gallery. Work from residencies don’t make it into the gallery archives. She is telling us her skills, administrative, social, analytical and critical.
A residency in a school. New awareness of CCTV of being observed, for who they are in public. (In my head I think about the contrast between who they are in public and who they are online, young people are growing up with online social networking, they are going to have a very different conception of they public self). Does the video work make sense out of its context, she asks. I wondered if it could make the right sense in that context, to me obviously is more readable to an art audience. Who are the participants in the artwork? The children in the video – are they the audience? Or are they the props? Or the artwork itself? Or is the art the ideas and only us – an initiated audience – the only ‘correct’ viewers?
Unofficial artist in residence in the British Library. I am doing a project a collaborative project where we decided to be unofficial artists in residence. Pipped to the post.
She says St. Pancreas instead of St. Pancras which always makes me laugh.
I wonder if she is able to direct her flow of residencies. I wonder if she has a wish list of institutions she would like to work with. I wonder if she feels like a gun for hire sometimes. I wonder if her work in the British Library addresses this. I wonder about the agency of the artist. I don’t ask.
I typed Clare Short by mistake at the top of the page. Interesting confusion.





David Bate/ Michelle Atherton, Transmission

10 01 2010

Transmission

18 November 2009

NOT THE OTHER.

David Bate. Host: Michelle Atherton.

I come in this transmission to learn more about the notion of difference, the title is attractive. David Bate is the name of the photographer, his lecture is on friendship, the notion of the OTHER. On the screen, an image of Gustave Courbet’s painting “Bonjour Monsieur Courbet.” The original is displayed in Montpellier’s Museum.

Michelle Atherton introduces the photographer as her best friend, then follow words ok kindness, generosity and… of true friendship.

Then the photographer starts by giving some explanations on what friends are, what friendship is, why one chooses to be with another. A friend is another. Being friend is sharing points of view, physical sensations of being together, recognizing sameness and difference. I can not help but agree with the presentation, because all my present work is based on otherness, relationship, friendship, questioning the Otherness…

He then extracts highlights of works which seem relevant, talks about some narrative background of 19th and 20th century : communism and fascism.

According to him, Fascism is linked to nostalgia, to returning to the past, to the purity of the past, the purity of the race. It is an idea of purification while communism is getting rid of the past, going forward.

Through his European Letters, a series of photos, he tries to explain the idea of “the Other” in what he calls a post-communism world. By exploring the strangeness, by manipulating the images with the computer, they become broke. What is familiar to us may become strange. Exploring the way to work, it’s experimental, the images become strange. (e.g how European families use and move in caravan)

It’s a subjective moment of otherness, the notion of known and unknown. Picture, motto and title, (images and text) altogether illustrate what he intend to do, he demonstrates how national identity and an attempt of homogeneity are not far from Xenophobia in different countries of Europe. Inclusion/ exclusion.

The second part of his lecture is called The Politics of Friendship. Through a video in Barcelona we see how narrative becomes important to the work. Seriality and sequentiality of photos explore the way human beings  and animal live together, the closeness between dogs (animals) and human beings.

He then talks about his experience in Estonia, while teaching photography. Students could speak English but they were a mile from a true understanding of the subject. Narrative/ problem of comprehension/ language…

In Zone 1, in reference to Andrei Tarkowski’s film, the Stalker (1979) he points out an allegory of what was happening in USSR. Aliens are contaminating the inhabitants of the Zone. Nobody knows what is really going on. The zone is a space where your unconscious desire will be fulfilled. Berlin was a zone where your desire would be a desire for capitalism, for the inhabitants of USSR.

In Zone 2 we see sixteen photos of the Zone (Tallin) in Estonia. The work is a dialogue between cultures, a kind of realism. Fragments become narrative. Realism and documentary : a fragmentary experience. The city has changed, it becomes strange, different, but it is still a city of soviet inheritance. A recipe of disaster things are not recognizable, everything is constantly changing. His work offers a picture of strangeness. Night-clubs and bars are like in the western world. It’s a kind of lost innocence…

The last work is an approach of what is similar within the western world. It’s a series of recent photos in Australians’ life titled Australia (09). The comfort of their apartments is like ours, the objects of the daily life, fridges, cups of tea, gardens, buildings, universities etc… Talking of friendship, If we think only in terms of likeness, sameness and togetherness we discard what makes us different each other, we are weakned. If we explore the boundaries between the sameness and the difference, we question our ability of living together.

The issue of is not in the recognition of the sameness, but in the division, a kind of split between public and private, their boundaries, nature and city, how we engage our implication. How we think urban space, nature, the cellular life and the possibility of thinking about globalization.

I have no doubt that together, considering our differences, we can rebuild a world different from this one, with a real sense of friendship, of otherness and togetherness, accepting the notion of strangeness as a whole, because in some way we are strangers to ourselves (Julia Kristeva). We will be working with our dreams, questioning our ability of finding solutions to our problems together…





Transmission rambling: What? (21st Oct 2009)

8 12 2009

By XESKO

Andrew Sneddon presented Roderick Buchanan, talking about friendship and family ties and left him alone on stage to make the presentation.

As I had Google it is name I was curious to watch the presentation. He started with a Hello, and then…

Hy ma naime is Andrew Sneddon, Blablabla, Blablablabla, Blablabla, Shecotland, Blablabla, Blablablabla, Blablabla, Irland, Blablabla, Blablablabla, Blablabla, fother, Blablabla, Blablablabla, Blablabla, and so on.

I didn’t understand anything about what he was talking about because of his dreadful accent. From what I saw, the work seemed to be on their cultural background and on the attempted union between the two Irish communities, divided by religion.

However I was wrong. At the end of the presentation I did exactly that question and got this answer… NOOOO Blablabla, Blablablabla, Blablabla, I’m prove af that, Blablabla, Blablablabla, Blablabla, and so one.

Summarize it in one word. Incomprehensible.

Want to read more? Writings from my Head





Transmission review: Bevis Martin & Charlie Youle, a presentation of their work (07th Oct 2009)

7 12 2009

By BROOK DAVIS

On the past Wednesday, the artist’s couple, Bevis Martin & Charlie Youle, made a presentation of their work to a group of students from the Sheffield Institute of Arts (SHU).

In a little over an hour they have summarize all their work, done essentially in Nice, France, where they live now.

The presentation was centered around the idea of our ordinary day-to-day and taking advantage of all that exists around us and its artistic reconstruction. From a simple in works storefront and abandoned objects, all they are an inspiration to recreate art.

Another of their obsessions is the immensity of the cosmos and its interaction with the living. The main idea that remained at the end of the presentation was that they try to recreate through art the absence/lack of something in their lives. However in fact isn’t this the biggest asset of the artists? The ability to consciously or unconsciously, fill their failures and losses through a concept that are in sight to all to see, but normally aren’t within sight of ordinary mortals? In fact, if this is the spring that moves the artists, this couple has the ability to make the extreme of a conclusive and understandable way for the common citizen.

Want to read more? Writings from my Head








Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.