By Xesko
Totalitarianism, criticism is a bad habit, enlightenment, relational aesthetics are equal to neo-conservadorism, the force of language, power, power, power, and more power, and so on and on and on…
What the f*** is this? She talks about materiality and materialism of language, about text/image persuasion… Nazi aesthetics are not art. The Soviet realism isn’t art at all. Nazi aesthetics and Soviet realism are under the same roof. Totalitarianism… So she denies that under totalitarianism, there is any kind of art. However, I don’t see her denying art created under the totalitarianism regimes from Portugal, Spain, Italy, Chile, Japan or China. Why? Forgetfulness or ignorance? I don’t know, maybe both.
His stage presence is imposing, is the master of herself the perfect dictator, but speaks to us of things disconnected and incongruous. Ultimately what kind of artist is this lady? For one thing there is no doubt she is a bossy artist…
After a lot of bullshit talk, she sits for presenting a film, hopefully better than the rest of their proselytism, but suddenly, BOOM BOOM, BOOM, the noise was so deafening and strong that makes me jump off the chair, I even cover my ears because it was unbearable. The images appeared in an oppressive and omnipresent manner, passing quickly on the screen, making it impossible to read. Finally, the silence, and the end of dictatorship.
Summarize it in one word. Incongruous.
Want to read more? Writings from my Head